Meaning
Procurement strategies that distribute a single order among multiple suppliers rather than relying on a single source protect the buyer from supply chain disruptions. This split volume allocation is a common practice for high-volume or critical components where the failure of one factory could stop the entire production line. By dividing the business, usually in a 60-40 or 70-30 ratio, the buyer ensures that at least two sets of tooling and two production teams are active.
This arrangement creates a natural backup system and fosters a competitive environment where each supplier is motivated to improve their performance to gain a larger share of the volume. It also provides the buyer with better market intelligence, as they can compare the costs and quality of two different vendors in real-time. In the context of Chinese manufacturing, this strategy is often used to mitigate risks related to local holidays, power outages, or regulatory changes that might affect one province but not another.
Ratio Determination
Deciding the exact split of the production volume between vendors requires a careful analysis of their respective capacities, quality levels, and financial stability. The split volume allocation usually gives the lion’s share of the work to the “primary” supplier who has demonstrated the best performance or lowest cost. The “secondary” supplier receives enough volume to keep their production line running and their staff trained, but not enough to be the main driver of the buyer’s business.
This ratio is not fixed and can be adjusted based on the ongoing performance of the vendors. If the primary supplier starts to see a rise in defect rates, the buyer can shift 10 or 20 percent of the volume to the secondary supplier as a warning or a corrective measure. This ability to move volume without starting from scratch is the core benefit of the strategy.
The buyer must ensure that the secondary supplier is capable of scaling up quickly if the primary supplier fails completely.
Risk Mitigation
Resilience in the face of unforeseen events is achieved by maintaining multiple independent paths for the delivery of critical components. The split volume allocation reduces the impact of a “single point of failure” in the supply chain. For example, if one factory is forced to close due to a fire or a local environmental audit, the other factory can immediately increase its output to cover the shortfall.
This prevents a complete shutdown of the buyer’s assembly plant, which can cost millions of dollars in lost sales. The strategy also protects against geopolitical risks or changes in trade policy that might affect certain regions differently. By having suppliers in different cities or even different countries, the buyer spreads their risk across multiple jurisdictions.
This diversification is especially important in the modern global economy where disruptions are becoming more frequent and severe. The cost of maintaining two suppliers is seen as an insurance premium that is well worth paying for the security of the supply.
Delivery Performance
Maintaining a high standard of service across multiple vendors requires a standardized set of metrics and a rigorous monitoring process. The split volume allocation system allows the buyer to benchmark the delivery times and lead times of each supplier against the other. This creates a transparent competition where the data speaks for itself.
Suppliers who consistently deliver on time and with zero defects are rewarded with a higher volume allocation. Those who struggle are given support to improve or see their share of the business shrink. This performance-based model encourages suppliers to invest in their own efficiency and quality control systems.
It also reduces the buyer’s dependence on any single vendor’s internal management. The buyer must manage the logistics of receiving goods from two different locations, which adds some complexity but also provides more flexibility in shipping routes. Regular business reviews are held with both suppliers to discuss their performance and the future allocation of volume.