Meaning
A mandatory formula in the employment code specifies the calculation method for financial compensation paid to employees when their labor agreements are terminated. Under the framework of national employment standards, labour contract law article 47 establishes the base rate of one month of salary for every full year of service. If a worker has been with a firm for more than six months but less than a year, the enterprise must pay one full month.
For terms under six months, the compensation is fixed at half a month of salary according to the current guidelines. The provision limits the maximum total compensation to twelve years of salary for those employees whose monthly pay exceeds three times the local average. This calculation is a fundamental right that applies to terminations initiated by the company through mutual agreement or due to organizational changes.
It stops short of covering individuals who are fired for serious misconduct or those who resign voluntarily without valid institutional cause.
Calculation Base
Compensation units use the average monthly salary of the worker from the twelve months preceding the official termination date to determine the payout. In the language of labour contract law article 47, this average include all salary items including normal pay, commission, bonuses and overtime subsidies received over the year. Management must exclude social insurance contributions and individual income taxes to reach the correct pre tax amount for the calculation.
If the company operates across several provinces, it uses the average social wage of the specific municipal area where the worker was based. The calculation is done step by step, identifying years of service first and then applying the multiplier to the average monthly earnings record. When a salary is unusually high, the law imposes a cap to ensure the sustainability of the firm and the fairness of the overall distribution.
Financial teams include these potential payouts in their quarterly accruals to ensure liquidity remains high during cycles of restructuring or division closures.
Operational Triggers
Payments become mandatory when a contract expires and the employer refuses to renew it on terms equivalent to or better than the original deal. According to labour contract law article 47, any severance payment must be completed simultaneously with the handover of duties and the return of company identification. This synchronization prevents companies from holding funds back as leverage during post employment disputes over equipment or confidential data.
Local authorities monitor these disbursements during audits to verify that the numbers match the years of service reported in the social insurance databases. If a gap appears, the labour bureau has the power to command additional payments plus a late interest fee on behalf of the individual. This legal pressure ensures that workers receive a financial cushion while transitioning between roles in the urban economy.
Host enterprises often set up dedicated reserves to manage these article 47 obligations, as sudden workforce adjustments can result in substantive cash drains.
Execution Standard
Creditors and courts identify these severance claims as priority debts during the formal liquidation of a factory or a corporate entity. Through the implementation of labour contract law article 47, the government guarantees a basic level of social protection that firms cannot remove through individual negotiation. The calculation logic is rigid, meaning any agreement to take less than the article 47 minimum is typically declared void by arbitration panels.
This protection extends to factory staff, office professionals and middle managers in foreign invested companies alike. For long term workers nearing retirement, this compensation represents a significant asset that they use to offset the costs of searching for new positions. Auditors regularly verify these items because an incorrect application of article 47 can lead to class action disputes inside large industrial districts.
Compliance ensures that the costs of termination are predictable for the employer while providing the worker with a standardized remedy for the loss of tenure.