Meaning
The valuation of goods and raw materials imported from associated overseas enterprises determines both the customs duty liability and the domestic taxable income of a multinational group’s local subsidiary. Under related party import pricing rules, these transaction values must comply with the arm’s length principle, meaning they should mirror the prices that would be agreed between independent parties. Chinese customs and tax authorities monitor these import values to prevent profits from being shifted out of the domestic jurisdiction.
The rules apply to all cross-border transactions where a special relationship exists between the buyer and the seller.
Regulatory Oversight
Dual administrative enforcement by tax and customs bureaus creates a high level of scrutiny for companies setting their internal import rates. While the General Administration of Customs reviews related party import pricing to ensure that transaction values are not artificially low (which would reduce import duties), the State Taxation Administration monitors them to ensure they are not too high (which would reduce corporate income tax). This opposing administrative focus requires importers to balance their pricing strategies carefully to satisfy both agencies simultaneously.
It forces multinational groups to adopt pricing policies that can withstand the differing audits of both departments.
Transfer Methodology
To justify these internal transactions, importers must apply and document one of several approved transfer pricing methods that are recognized by Chinese tax and customs authorities. The selection of the method depends on the function and risk profile of the local subsidiary, with the resale price method, the cost-plus method, or the transactional net margin method being the most common choices. Under related party import pricing rules, the importer must prepare a economic analysis comparing its profitability against that of independent peer companies.
This analysis is compiled in the annual local file and must be presented to tax officers upon request during routine or special transfer pricing reviews. If the analysis shows that the subsidiary’s profit is too low compared to industry benchmarks, tax authorities will reject the pricing and adjust the company’s taxable income.
Audit Risk
Failure to defend these transfer prices can result in tax adjustments, interest charges, and a permanent damage to the enterprise’s compliance rating. Applying for joint tax-customs agreements remains the most effective way to eliminate these audit risks and secure long-term pricing certainty. Companies must continuously monitor their transaction data and maintain up-to-date transfer pricing documentation to ensure they can defend their positions at a moment’s notice.