Meaning
Civil liability doctrines in Chinese intellectual property practice penalize parties that intentionally encourage or assist others in committing patent or trademark violations. The concept of inducing infringement holds a company liable as a joint tortfeasor even if it does not directly manufacture the infringing product. This doctrine applies when an entity provides instructions or promotional materials that lead another party to commit an act of infringement.
It extends the reach of intellectual property enforcement to the upstream actors in the supply chain.
Intent Requirement
Establishing liability requires proving that the defending party knew of the existence of the patent or trademark. The plaintiff must show that the defendant actively encouraged the direct infringer to bypass protective measures. This prevents accidental liability.
Causal Connection
A successful claim depends on demonstrating a direct causal connection between the inducement and the actual infringement. Under the rules of inducing infringement, if the direct party would not have committed the violation without the encouragement or technical assistance of the defendant, the defendant cannot escape liability. This requires the claimant to present emails, manuals, or training records that show the defendant’s active role.
Such evidence establishes the chain of causation necessary for joint liability.
Damages Allocation
Courts will allocate damages based on the degree of fault and the economic benefit gained by each party. The inducing party often faces the burden of paying the majority of the damages if they orchestrated the infringement. This risk makes it essential for component suppliers to avoid providing instructions on how to assemble products in a manner that violates patents.