Employer of Record Compliance against Direct Corporate Payroll
Direct WFOE payroll provides complete legal IP sovereignty and lower landed cost over EOR dispatch for China teams exceeding four employees.
Article 47 Severance
Meaning
Statutory labor regulations in China mandate a specific monetary payment to employees when a labor contract is terminated through no fault of the individual under defined conditions of the Employment Contract Law. This legal requirement operates as a safeguard for workers during restructuring, mass layoffs, or specific instances of employer-driven termination. Inside the framework of article 47 severance, the calculation relies strictly on the length of service and the average monthly salary of the personnel involved.
The law defines service increments as one full month of salary for every full year worked with the current employer, up to a specific statutory cap. For segments of employment that last less than six months, the individual receives a half-month payment, whereas periods between six months and a full year trigger the equivalent of a full month’s credit. This financial obligation applies uniformly across various industrial sectors and remains a central consideration for foreign firms planning workforce adjustments in the Chinese market.
Standard Calculation
Basic methodology for determining the specific payout amount follows a rigid sequence of identifying the base salary and the duration of the employment relationship. In the execution of article 47 severance, the monthly salary utilized for the calculation is determined by the average earnings of the twelve months immediately preceding the termination. If an employee earns significantly more than the local average, the base rate is restricted to three times the average monthly salary reported by the local municipal statistics bureau.
The second mechanical step is multiplying this finalized base rate by the number of years served at the enterprise. A secondary ceiling limits the total service credit to twelve years for employees whose salaries exceed the local average multiple mentioned previously. For those with salaries below this ceiling, the years of service count continues without the twelve year limit until the actual date of contract expiration or termination.
Regulatory Enforcement
Judicial interpretation of these severance payouts prioritizes the accurate reporting of wages to prevent tax evasion or the underpayment of departing staff. While using article 47 severance, companies must ensure that the figures include bonuses, allowances, and other verifiable benefits rather than just basic base pay. Local labor bureaus oversee the fairness of these settlements and mediate when employees contest the calculation of their tenure or base salary.
A discrepancy between the employer’s internal ledger and the official social insurance contribution record often leads to a recalculation order from the labor arbitration commission. Failure to pay the correct amount on the date of termination triggers legal penalties, which sometimes doubles the original amount due if the delay is deemed intentional. Foreign enterprises often utilize third party auditors to verify these sums before presenting severance packages to employees to minimize the risk of expensive local litigation.
Conditional Exemption
Operational scenarios where the severance is not required include instances of mutual agreement initiated by the employee or termination for cause involving serious misconduct. Under article 47 severance, specific exemptions apply when an employee decides to resign voluntarily without any breach of contract by the company. Similarly, if a fixed term contract expires and the employer offers a renewal under identical or improved conditions, no severance is due if the employee rejects the offer.
If the company chooses not to renew the contract under the same conditions, the severance obligation returns to its active status. This distinction prevents personnel from gaming the system by engineering their own exits while protecting those whose income stability is legitimately threatened by corporate decisions. Accurate record keeping regarding the context of the exit remains essential for the employer to claim these exemptions.
Statutory guidance focuses on the intent behind the separation to determine if the financial bridge provided by the severance is legally necessitated.